The issue is the thought process that begins an article on our impending disaster with "porn" and ends with "money".

Just as describing the urgent and anxious discussions of our horrible future as pornography is misguided, the idea that "money", a purely human construct that we somehow do not have enough of is the solution to the problem it created in the first place is also misguided.

We can not pay nature to look away.

We can not buy our way out of this predicament.

Who would we pay?

Who has the salvation we need but is holding out for a few dollars more?